OCS / Tools / Observing Campaign Planner

Observing Campaign Planner

Forecast the direct astrometric acceleration test on ω Cen's fast stars: the GM/r² signal versus the least-squares curvature sensitivity of Paper C §5.3, per facility and baseline. The honest answer today is 0.21σ; this page quantifies when (and whether) that changes.

⚠ Model-dependent projections
Target & Instrument
20 yr
0.08 pc
Science Context

The ω Cen IMBH question has two irreconcilable published bounds: ≥ 8,200 M☉ (stellar kinematics, Häberle 2024) and ≤ 6,000 M☉ (pulsar timing, Bañares 2025). Closing the 2,200 M☉ gap requires an independent astrometric measurement with precision well below that mass window.

The key technical challenge is the inner 0.08 pc — only about 3.0 arcsec at 5.49 kpc. Crowded-field astrometry in this region demands either space-based imaging (Roman) or extreme-AO ground-based (ELT-MICADO).

Distance adopted: 5.49 kpc · Core radius: 0.08 pc · Velocity dispersion: ~18.2 km/s · All figures cite measurements.js.

Acceleration signal
—
mas/yr² (GM/r²)
Sensitivity σ_a
—
mas/yr² (curvature)
Significance
—
signal / σ_a
Goal baseline
—
S/N ∝ T^2.5
Feasibility Assessment
Calculating…
ParameterValueNotes
Related proposals → ELT-MICADO JWST JWST Deep MeerKAT Pulsar

      

Resource Estimation Model

This is a direct port of the astrometric estimator of Paper C §5.3 (Campaign paper), which supersedes this page's original mass-resolution model. The signal is the quadrupole-beam acceleration a = GM/r² of a central mass at the target star's projected radius, expressed in mas/yr² at the cluster distance (mean projection factors of order unity absorbed). The sensitivity is one least-squares chain: for existing catalogues the catalogue's own proper-motion precision fixes the curvature term through σ_a = 7.75 σ_μ/T (Paper C eq. 3, third form), with archive extension scaled as T^-2.5; for facilities without a catalogue the uniform-cadence chain σ_a = 26.83 σ_pos/(√N T²) at 2 epochs/yr applies. Both give S/N ∝ T^2.5, which is how the goal-baseline extrapolation works.

The per-star coherent acceleration problem is not reduced by averaging many stars: the old √N_stars ensemble claim is gone, as is the epoch-count "feasible in 3 epochs" verdict. Paper C's calibrated conclusion stands: the nominal 2×10⁴ M☉ signal measures 0.21σ on the oMEGACat catalogue (σ_μ = 6.6 μas/yr at T = 20 yr) and crosses 1σ only at T ≈ 38 yr, around 2040, which is why the campaign's decision-grade astrometry routes through photocentric-wander and reference-frame measurements instead.

Instrument Modes

oMEGACat: existing catalogue, σ_μ = 6.6 μas/yr inside r < 1.5′ on a 20-yr baseline (Haberle et al. 2024, oMEGACat II); chain form, no assumed cadence.

Roman: 15 μas/epoch forward forecast. ELT-MICADO: 80 μas/epoch. Gaia DR4: 40 μas/epoch. Custom: state either a catalogue proper-motion precision (chain form) or a per-epoch precision (forward form).

Tool version 2.0 · 2026-09-24 · Code: MIT · Prose: CC BY 4.0 · Estimator: Paper C §5.3 (campaign-paper.tex), re-derivation in paper/figs/fC_r9_checks.py
Part of the settle-the-imbh-question workflow: workflow-settle-imbh-question.html
Feeds: Observational proposals