🔭 DRAFT RESEARCH PROPOSAL · INFRARED IMAGING · JWST NIRCam + MIRI

JWST NIRCam/MIRI Deep Accretion Limits for the Omega Centauri IMBH Candidate

Improving current electromagnetic accretion constraints by 1–2 orders of magnitude through deep multi-band infrared photometry targeting ultra-low-luminosity accretion onto the candidate IMBH — complementary to the NIRSpec/IFU managed environment proposal · Working draft · April 2026

Note on companion proposal: This proposal targets direct accretion detection through broadband point-source photometry. The companion JWST NIRSpec/IFU proposal targets chemical abundance mapping to detect the fingerprints of controlled tidal disruption. Both use JWST but address different science questions and can be pursued independently.

1. Scientific Rationale

1.1 Current Constraints and the Gap

Existing multi-wavelength limits on accretion in OC's core:

For a 20,000–50,000 M☉ IMBH, these constraints imply accretion at extraordinarily sub-Eddington rates. However, the existing Chen et al. observations were not optimised for maximum depth or confusion mitigation. Improving IR limits by 1–2 orders of magnitude would constrain Ṁ below 10⁻¹¹–10⁻¹² Ṁ_Edd — definitively establishing OC as either the most weakly accreting known black hole or revealing a faint counterpart below current sensitivity.

1.2 Target Flux Range

For an IMBH of 20,000–50,000 M☉:

L_Edd ≈ 1.3×10³⁸ (M/M☉) erg/s ≈ 2.5×10⁴² – 6×10⁴² erg/s Target detectable L_IR ≈ 10³⁰–10³² erg/s (10⁻¹²–10⁻¹⁰ L_Edd) At D = 5.49 kpc: F ≈ 10⁻¹⁹ – 10⁻¹⁷ erg/cm²/s ≈ 1–50 nJy

This is accessible to deep JWST integrations with careful crowded-field treatment.

2. Observation Strategy

2.1 NIRCam Imaging (Primary Detection Channel)

ParameterValue
FiltersF200W, F356W, F444W (red continuum + non-stellar SED signature)
Exposure per filter20 ks (~5.5 hr); 3 filters = 60 ks (~17 hr)
Achieved sensitivity~5–10 nJy (confusion-limited; 3× crowding penalty applied)
Crowding mitigationPSF subtraction using WebbPSF; sub-pixel dithering; empirical PSF from off-centre fields
Target luminosityL ≈ few × 10³⁰ erg/s at SNR = 5

2.2 MIRI Imaging (Thermal / Dusty Component)

ParameterValue
FiltersF770W, F1000W (mid-IR excess from dusty inflow or reprocessed emission)
Exposure per filter15 ks (~4 hr each); 2 filters = 30 ks (~8 hr)
Achieved sensitivity~30–70 nJy
Science targetsDusty inflow; reprocessed accretion emission; non-stellar IR excess

2.3 Variability Epoch Strategy

Two epochs separated by ~6 months provide variability detection at ≥20–30% amplitude, enabling rejection of stellar contaminants (which do not vary at this level on this timescale) and detection of accretion flares. A variable non-stellar point source at OC's dynamical centre would be a compelling IMBH counterpart candidate.

ComponentTime
NIRCam (3 filters × 20 ks × 2 epochs)~34 hr
MIRI (2 filters × 15 ks × 2 epochs)~16 hr
Overheads (~30%)~15 hr
Total JWST request~65 hr (two-epoch program)

2.4 Optional ELT Component

The ELT (first light 2028) will provide ~5–10 mas angular resolution in AO mode — directly resolving the confusion-limited core at OC's distance. An ELT AO imaging program (5–10 hr, sensitivity comparable to JWST at higher angular resolution) would confirm or rule out any JWST candidate. This can be submitted as a companion ELT proposal once a JWST detection or strong upper limit is in hand.

3. Expected Outcomes

ScenarioOutcomeOCS Implication
Detection: L_IR ≳ few × 10³⁰ erg/sFirst EM counterpart to OC IMBH; constrain Ṁ and radiative efficiency ηNatural quiescent accretion — consistent with null and OCS hypotheses alike
Non-detection: L < 10³⁰ erg/sUpper limit: Ṁ < 10⁻¹²–10⁻¹¹ Ṁ_Edd; OC becomes benchmark for radiatively inefficient accretionDeepest EM silence yet — strengthens both gas-starvation and managed-environment interpretations
Variable source detectedAccretion variability; strong IMBH counterpart candidateTriggers multi-wavelength follow-up including KM3NeT/IceCube ToO

4. Work Plan

YearQMilestoneDeliverable
1Q1–Q2JWST GO proposal preparation; PSF modelling pipeline setupJWST proposal submitted to Cycle 4/5
1–2JWST observations executed (TAC scheduling)Raw NIRCam + MIRI data
2Q1–Q2Crowded-field photometry; epoch-1 deep limitsFirst-epoch sensitivity curves
2Q3–Q4Epoch-2 observations; variability analysisVariability catalogue
3Q1–Q2SED fitting; accretion modelling; radio cross-checkDraft paper (deep limits or detection)
3Q3–Q4Publication; public data releaseSubmitted to ApJ

5. Budget

ItemCost (USD)Notes
PI (0.2 FTE, 3yr)225,000IR astronomy / JWST data expertise required
Postdoc (1.0 FTE, 3yr)285,000NIRCam + MIRI reduction; crowded-field photometry lead
Graduate student (1.0 FTE, 3yr)165,000SED modelling; accretion flow interpretation
Co-I support (2 × 0.1 FTE)240,000Stellar dynamics + high-energy interface
JWST time0Awarded via TAC (no direct cost)
HPC + cloud storage80,000NIRCam mosaics; MIRI data cubes
Travel + publications60,000STScI JWST meetings; 2 open-access papers
Fringe + overhead (~30%)255,000
Total~$1.31M (3 yr)

6. References

  1. Chen, S., et al. (2025). JWST constraints on OC IMBH accretion. arXiv:2511.20945
  2. Mahida, A. D., et al. (2025). ATCA radio non-detection. ApJ, 996, 122. arXiv:2512.09649
  3. Häberle, M., et al. (2024). Fast-moving stars in ω Cen. Nature, 631, 285. arXiv:2405.06015
  4. Häberle, M., et al. (2025). oMEGACat VI — kinematic distance 5.49 kpc. ApJ, 983, 95. arXiv:2503.04903
  5. Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. (2020). Intermediate-Mass Black Holes. ARA&A, 58, 257. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835
  6. Gezari, S. (2021). Tidal Disruption Events. ARA&A, 59, 21.
Working draft · April 2026 · Companion to JWST NIRSpec/IFU Managed Environment proposal · ← Return to omegacentauri.me

Relevant tools

JWST Accretion Limits
IR spectroscopic accretion constraints
IMBH Evidence Dashboard
Live multi-constraint overview
Magnetic Reconnection
Reconnection power vs BZ output
BZ–Kardashev Power
Jet power from spinning IMBH