Black Hole Scale Comparator

Drag the mass from 3 M☉ to 10¹⁰ M☉ and watch the Schwarzschild radius, mean density, and tidal acceleration transform. The ω Cen IMBH candidate window is shown as a shaded band.

● Peer-reviewed physics
7,100
M☉ (solar masses)
ω Cen IMBH planning value
3 M☉
Stellar
10³ M☉
IMBH
10⁶ M☉
SMC nuclei
10¹⁰ M☉
TON 618
← stellar IMBH window supermassive →
Schwarzschild Radius
km
Mean Density inside rs
kg/m³
Tidal acceleration (h=1.8m, r=rs)
m/s²

Familiar comparisons

ω Centauri IMBH Candidate Window

Two published measurements produce irreconcilable bounds. The shaded band on the slider marks both published limits — not a consensus.

≥ 8,200 M☉
Häberle et al. 2024
Stellar kinematics
≤ 6,000 M☉
Bañares et al. 2025
Pulsar timing
Black Hole 101 Workflow → Infall & Survival tool

Schwarzschild Radius

r_s = 2GM/c² where G = 6.674×10⁻¹¹ m³/(kg·s²), c = 2.998×10⁸ m/s, M_☉ = 1.989×10³⁰ kg. Numerically: r_s ≈ 2953 × (M/M☉) metres.

Mean Density

Uniform sphere at the Schwarzschild radius: ρ = M / (4π/3 · r_s³). Scales as M⁻². For a 10 M☉ black hole, density exceeds the nuclear density of ~2×10¹⁷ kg/m³; for SMBHs it can be below that of water.

Tidal Acceleration

At radius r from the centre, tidal stretching across height h: a_tidal = 2GMh/r³. Here r = r_s and h = 1.8 m (standing human). Note: at the event horizon itself r = r_s, so the formula gives an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a physically meaningful crossing value.

IMBH bounds

Häberle et al. 2024, Nature 631:285 — stellar kinematic lower bound. Bañares-Hernández et al. 2025, A&A 693:A104 — pulsar timing upper bound.

Tool version 1.0 · 2026-06-10 · Code: MIT · Prose: CC BY 4.0 · Part of the Black Hole 101 workflow.