OCS / Tools / Workflow — Closing the Constraint Window

1Open Window → 2Pulsar Timing → 3JWST Accretion → 4LISA IMRI → ✓Race
Four-stage workflow · the observational race to a decisive IMBH verdict

Closing the Constraint Window

Four observational channels compared: which instrument settles the 6,000–8,200 M☉ tension between Häberle et al. 2024 and Bañares-Hernández et al. 2025, and when?

🔬 Established astrophysics
No backend · No tracking · State in URL hash · v1.0 · 2026-06-01
01
Häberle et al. 2024 · Bañares-Hernández et al. 2025
The Open Window
Set the lower and upper mass limits to see the tension
▶

The Häberle et al. 2024 proper-motion result establishes a 3σ lower limit of ≥8,200 M☉. Bañares-Hernández et al. 2025 pulsar timing sets a 3σ upper limit of ≤6,000 M☉. These measurements are in tension at the 3σ level — both cannot be simultaneously correct under standard assumptions. (The Constraint Stacker's own default JWST accretion density anchors a separate, tighter upper bound of ~709 M☉, not used as the default here.) Stage 2–4 show what each instrument needs to deliver a decisive verdict.

Inputs
8,200 M☉
6,000 M☉
Stage 1 outputs
Window width—M☉
Tension indicator—
Lower bound M_lo—M☉
Upper bound M_hi—M☉
Tension heuristic (not a formal σ)—
—
→Passes to Stages 2–4: lower bound —, upper bound —
02
Bañares-Hernández et al. 2025 · MeerKAT / SKA
MeerKAT / SKA Pulsar Timing
More pulsars + longer baseline reduces the mass uncertainty
▶

The Bañares-Hernández et al. 2025 constraint comes from 5 pulsars in OC's core. Adding more pulsars reduces the uncertainty on the gravitational potential. The MeerKAT timing sensitivity on the upper mass limit scales as 1/√N_psr × 1/√baseline. The key threshold: √(N×B) > 3.66 drives the projected upper limit below the 8,200 M☉ lower bound, meaning the two measurement sets become mutually exclusive at stated confidence. At N=5 pulsars a baseline of only ~2.7 years crosses it. Crossing is not a resolution: further investment only deepens the exclusivity, the signature of a genuine systematic conflict.

Inputs (M_lo, M_hi from Stage 1)
Constraint bounds from Stage 1—
5 pulsars
5 yr
Stage 2 outputs
New upper limit (3σ)—M☉
Improvement factor—
√(N×B) product—
Min baseline for exclusive bounds (at current N)—yr
Min pulsars for exclusive bounds (at current baseline)—psr
—
→Pulsar timing new upper limit: —
03
Chen et al. 2025 · NIRCam / MIRI · Bondi accretion
JWST NIRCam / MIRI Accretion
Accretion luminosity limit → mass limit under Bondi efficiency assumptions
▶

Chen et al. 2025 placed an upper limit on IMBH accretion luminosity from JWST NIRCam/MIRI observations, which translates to a mass limit only under assumptions about the accretion efficiency ε. The constraint weakens for low ε — at ε = 10⁻³ the limit is ~6,000 M☉, consistent with Bañares, but at ε = 10⁻⁵ (radiatively inefficient flow) the limit weakens to ~60,000 M☉, compatible with any proposed mass. The ambient gas density sets the Bondi rate. Note that the "JWST mass upper limit" above is a hand-scaled anchor pinned to 6,000 M☉ at the nominal ε/n; the Bondi ṁ, luminosity, and Eddington-ratio figures below it are computed independently and evaluated at the Stage-1 lower bound, not solved for their own mass limit. The two are separate estimates on this page, not cross-validated to agree.

Inputs
Constraint bounds from Stage 1—
ε = 10⁻³
n = 0.1 cm⁻³
Stage 3 outputs
JWST mass upper limit—M☉
Bondi accretion rate—M☉/yr
Accretion luminosity limit—W
Eddington ratio L/L_Edd (at M_lo)—
ε needed to exclude M_lo—
—
→JWST upper limit at chosen ε: —
04
LISA · IMRI chirp mass · 2030s
LISA Chirp Mass Measurement
IMRI detection gives IMBH mass to sub-percent precision
▶

If a stellar-mass black hole in OC spirals into the IMBH, LISA will measure the chirp mass via δM/M ≈ 1/(SNR × √N_cycles) from the inspiral gravitational waveform. This translates to an IMBH mass posterior width that depends on the mass ratio q = m_stellar/M_IMBH and the signal-to-noise ratio; at the fiducial defaults (SNR = 100, q = 10⁻³) this computes to ~0.0012% (not the ~0.1% a naive estimate might suggest). A single IMRI detection definitively closes the constraint window. The expected IMRI rate for a ~10,000 M☉ IMBH in a dense globular cluster is ~10⁻⁸ yr⁻¹ per cluster.

Inputs
M_IMBH (lower bound, Stage 1)—
q = 10⁻³
SNR = 100
Stage 4 outputs
IMBH mass uncertainty σ_M—M☉
Fractional precision δM/M—
N_cycles (approximate)—
Window closed? (σ_M vs gap)—
Resolves tension?—
—
→LISA would measure M_IMBH to — — resolves the constraint window definitively
✓ Constraint Window Verdicts — Which Channels Are Decisive?
Instrument Upper limit / σ_M (M☉) vs. Häberle lower bound Status
MeerKAT/SKA Pulsar———
JWST Accretion———
LISA IMRI———

—