OCS / Tools / Accretion → Engineering-Ready Spin

1Feeding Rate → 2Spin-Up Timeline → 3BZ Power → 4Orbit Positioning → ✓Summary
Four-stage MTH chain · accretion → spin-up → BZ power → orbital positioning

From Feeding Rate to Engineering-Ready Spin

The MTH engineering chain: given OC's IMBH current accretion state, how long until it reaches an engineering-viable spin? Then: what BZ power becomes available, and where would you park a computation substrate?

🔬 Bondi + Kerr physics (stages 1–3) ✦ MTH application (stage 4)
Refs: González Prieto 2025 · Thorne 1974 · Blandford & Znajek 1977 · Smart 2012 · v1.0 · 2026-06-03
01
Bondi–Hoyle accretion · González Prieto et al. 2025
Current Feeding Rate
▶

OC's IMBH is currently in a quiescent/sub-Eddington accretion state with no detected radio or X-ray counterpart. The Bondi–Hoyle rate from the ambient stellar winds and ISM in OC's core sets the mass inflow. Only a fraction F_Bondi actually reaches the horizon.

Inputs
8,200 M☉
1.0 cm⁻³
0.030
Stage 1 outputs
Accretion rate ṁacc—M☉/yr
Eddington fraction λ—
Accretion mode—
Mass gain in 1 Myr—M☉
→ ṁacc = — M☉/yr · λ = —
02
Thorne 1974 · prograde disc spin-up
Spin-Up Timeline
▶

Prograde disc accretion spins up the IMBH toward the Thorne limit (a★ = 0.998). The spin-up mass fraction is ΔM/M = 1 − √(r_ISCO(a★)/6). At the current quiescent accretion rate, this takes an astronomically long time without engineering assistance.

Inputs (ṁ_acc from Stage 1)
a★₀ = 0.10
a★ = 0.900
ε = 0.100
Stage 2 outputs
Mass needed ΔM (natural)—M☉
Time to reach a★target—yr
Verdict vs. cluster dissolution—
→ a★target = — · Time = — yr
03
Blandford–Znajek 1977 · ergospheric power extraction
BZ Power at Target Spin
▶

At the target spin, the BZ mechanism extracts rotational energy electromagnetically. Power scales steeply: P_BZ ∝ B² M² a². The horizon magnetic field is constrained from below by the current accretion rate.

Inputs (M_BH, a★_target from Stages 1–2)
10⁶ T
Stage 3 outputs
BZ power PBZ—W
Kardashev scale K—
vs. Solar luminosity—
→ PBZ = — W · K = —
04
✦ MTH application · Smart 2012
Optimal Computation Orbit
▶

With engineering-viable spin achieved, a computation substrate orbiting the IMBH at the ISCO (or slightly outside) experiences gravitational time dilation — more subjective computation time per external year. The ISCO radius and time-dilation factor are fixed by the target spin.

ISCO geometry at a★target
rISCO—rg
rISCO physical—km
Time dilation γ at ISCO—
Subjective years per Gyr—proper yr/Gyr
Orbital period at ISCO—

The time dilation factor γ at r_ISCO means that for every year experienced locally by a near-ISCO substrate, γ years pass at infinity. This is the core MTH efficiency argument: the same computation resources deliver γ× more subjective experience per external year compared to a distant substrate.

At a★ = 0.998 (Thorne limit), r_ISCO ≈ 1.24 r_g and γ ≈ 4.5. At a★ = 0.9, r_ISCO ≈ 2.32 r_g and γ ≈ 1.8.

✓ Accretion → Spin Summary
ṁacc
—
M☉/yr
Spin-up time
—
years
PBZ
—
watts
γ at ISCO
—
dilation factor

Computing…