Paper E's Figure 2, interactive. An engineered swarm that processes power P_comp radiates a waste luminosity L_waste = (1 − f_sink)·P_comp at a blackbody temperature set by its radius. Which telescope bounds it depends on where that emission peaks, so the mid-infrared limit is radius-dependent. Drag a source through the (r, L_waste) plane and the (P_comp, 1 − f_sink) plane to read where it sits against the JWST/WISE/Spitzer wedges, the transport floor, and the fuel ceiling.
A swarm processing power P_comp and delivering a fraction f_sink of its generated entropy to the horizon radiates the remainder, L_waste = (1 − f_sink)·P_comp, thermally at T_eff = (L_waste / 4π r² σ_SB)^(1/4). That is roughly 300 K for 1 L☉ at r ~ 1 AU but only ~50 K at 10³ AU. The (r, L_waste) plane resolves this temperature axis: which telescope limits a source depends on where its blackbody peaks. The (P_comp, 1 − f_sink) plane is the warm-swarm slice, where the JWST sub-L☉ limit maps to a simple hyperbola P_comp·(1 − f_sink) > 1 L☉.
The piecewise mid-infrared point-source limit L_lim_mir(T_eff), degraded for crowding at the 5.43 kpc distance of the ω Cen core, is taken verbatim from common.py:
The red wedge is the locus L_waste > L_lim_mir(T_eff(L_waste, r)), computed on the same L-grid the figure uses. A cool outer swarm evades the bound entirely: past 60 μm the only photometry is MIPS 70 μm, and it is insensitive at the L☉ level in this field.
Three assumptions carry the constraint. They are stated in Paper E §2.7 and are the reason the wedge sits where it does:
T_eff(r) assumes the swarm fully intercepts and re-radiates. A sparse swarm of covering fraction f_cov runs hotter by f_cov^(−1/4), moving mass into the JWST wedge. The paper reports this shifts the composite ln K to −0.34 at f_cov = 10⁻², still inside the quoted band.The dashed line at 1 − f_sink = 10⁻⁴ is the Appendix A.3 entropy-transport bound, drawn (as in the figure) as an adopted parameter over hatching rather than a data-driven boundary: below it is disfavoured by the A.3 accounting, not excluded by data. A lower true floor weakens the mid-infrared charge and moves ln K toward zero; a higher floor tightens the P_comp ceiling. The blue dashed 8×10⁵ L☉ fuel ceiling is the ambient Bondi accretion supply (ṁ_Bondi·c², MAD efficiency ~1); imported mass moves it right at the cost of visibility. L_Edd for the 2×10⁴ M☉ hole is shown for reference.
The fuel ceiling is computed with the paper's central velocity dispersion σ = 21 km/s (from common.py), the value Paper E adopts. The site's other calculators use a fiducial σ = 18.2 km/s; the offset is documented and deliberate (A5 decision) and is not silently harmonized. The ceiling scales weakly with σ through the Bondi rate, so the ~8×10⁵ L☉ figure is robust to the difference.
This is the waste-heat leg of the engineered-IMBH feasibility argument (Paper E). The (P_comp, 1 − f_sink) and (r, L_waste) planes together define the surviving parameter volume the paper's Bayesian adjudication marginalizes over. See also the Paper E feasibility scenario and Compute-in-Space.